A 12/28/2016 article in the Portland Press Herald describes a project in Madison, more than twice the size of others in the state, which will supply 3,000 homes and small businesses.
MADISON — The state’s largest solar farm could be fully operational this week.
The solar energy project in the Madison Business Gateway is more than twice the size of any other in Maine and was constructed by Ohio-based ISG Energy over the summer and fall. It was originally expected to be up and running by Thanksgiving, but the permitting process took longer than expected and construction ran behind.
The farm will produce nearly 5 megawatts of electricity and Madison Electric Works will purchase all of it, said utility Superintendent Calvin Ames. He expects the project to be online by the end of this week or very early in the new year.
Read the rest of the story.
The following article is from the Oct. 25, 2016 York Weekly.
Stretching the dollar and staying warm
YORK — As many as 50 lower-income York families – homeowners and renters – will be a little warmer this winter and spend less on fuel, thanks to a unique collaboration with York Community Service Association, Habitat for Humanity York County, York Rotary Club and the state program Efficiency Maine.
Eligible occupants of houses and mobile homes throughout town will receive free weatherization services from local volunteers and professionals, including an energy audit, through a new program expected to get off the ground by next month.
The idea for the program began when Rotarian Rozanna Patane attended a Habitat event late last year and learned the organization offered a weatherization program, she said.
“I asked, ‘Would you think about York?’ and they said yes. Then I turned to Michelle (Surdoval, executive director of YCSA) and she said yes. Then I asked the Rotary Club and they said yes,” she said.
Chairwoman of the town’s Energy Steering Committee, Patane added, “It’s been on my mind from the beginning that energy efficiency measures and clean energy are often alternatives available to people who have money. As a matter of social fairness, we need to make the same kind of resources available to those who don’t have money.”
“People who are getting fuel assistance are still wanting to do the best thing they can for the environment and themselves,” said Surdoval. “They’re conscious of the energy they’re using.”
The collaboration is a first of its kind for Habitat for Humanity, said director Amy Nucci. “It’s very exciting for us. Our county is very big and last year we were able to help just 32 people through our weatherization program. It’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of need. York is the only place that’s doing this now, but we look forward to expanding that.”
Initially, the program was going to get underway with funding of $7,000 — $3,500 each from the York Rotary Club and a grant from the regional Rotary District 7780. Surdoval, also a Rotarian, Patane and Nucci put together a plan based on Habitat’s typical, $250 weatherization protocol – window inserts, weather stripping, caulking, air sealing, basement sills and exposed pipe insulation.
Depending on what Habitat discovers when it sends a crew, there may be a need for more intensive work, like installing storm doors or adding a hatch cover. Habitat sets aside $500 for this work.
In York’s case, with the Rotary money, they figured they were going to be able to accommodate 16 projects, in addition to paying for window inserts for 30 renters. Then along came Efficiency Maine, and things changed quickly.
The state agency just launched a $2 million Low Income Home Energy Savings Program, intended to help eligible people throughout Maine who live in poorly insulated and inefficient homes.
“Rozanna called me out of the blue and said, ‘Do you have any suggestions that could help us?’” said Dana Fischer, residential program manager at Efficiency Maine. “I said, ‘Stop the presses. I’m coming down to talk with you.’ This is just the kind of collaborative group I’m looking for.”
So the $250 weatherization per household was leveraged into $1,050 — $1,000 of Efficiency Maine money with a $50 local match. The $500 weatherization morphed into $1,500. The three women are still trying to figure out how to use the original money in the most cost-effective way, but it’s clear that there will be many more than 16 projects.
Part of the allure for Efficiency Maine, said Patane, is volunteer involvement from both Rotary and from Habitat for Humanity. “We brought a solid concept and a partnership that was already in place. As many as 20 volunteers from the York Rotary Club will be working on these projects.” The group is also recruiting York churches, service organization and Scout troops to help out.
Renters are another important part of the program, though how that will work practically is still being determined. Habitat offers window inserts to renters, but anything beyond that becomes an owner issue. Patane said Fischer will be coming to York to meet with landlords to let them know what Efficiency Maine programs are available to them specifically. “Hopefully, we can come to an agreement with what is possible for renters. That’s evolving,” said Patane.
Patane and Surdoval bring their own outlook to this project.
For Surdoval, it means families who call York home can see their dollars stretched just a little further. “Many families we work with have been here for generations. This is their community and they’re not leaving, and they’re trying to figure out how to stay. This is a preventive model for me. This is trying to stay ahead of the curve before it gets into a bigger crisis.”
From the Energy Steering Committee perspective, said Patane, “in addition to everything Michelle just said, we’re actually reducing energy demand in total on the earth if we can make homes more efficient. That’s a worthy goal for us as a community and a need for us globally.”
For more information on the program or to volunteer, contact Surdoval at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The weatherization program is seeking volunteers, and has scheduled training programs for interested individuals and groups.
The first training sessions are scheduled at York Library on Wednesday, Nov. 9, and at the Habitat for Humanity ReStore on Saturday, Nov. 12. There will be other training opportunities in the future, and a window-building workshop is being scheduled for late November. The groups who are working on the project hope to have the first five homes weatherized before Christmas.
Individuals, churches, Boy and Girl Scout troops, service organizations and other groups are invited to participate.
Those interested in volunteering are asked to email email@example.com.
The information below is excerpted from ReVision Energy‘s April 2016 newsletter:
Maine’s NeXt Metering Hangs in the Balance
Maine has made national headlines for its innovative proposed solar policy, which brought together interests as diverse as utility companies, ratepayer advocates, labor unions, environmental groups, municipal representatives, and solar installers to develop an evolution of net metering.
Unfortunately, the widespread consensus shattered when the bill arrived in Maine’s legislature. Rep. Nathan Wadsworth (R-Hiram), who previously supported the bill, abruptly turned around and advocated a stance to maintain the status quo.
The Governor’s office has made their intentions clear, by advocating a position which would cap rates for solar well below their market value and reduce the term of solar contracts to ten years, effectively making solar impossible to build in Maine. . .
What is LD1649 all about?
Some of the key provisions of the bill:
- Establishes goal of 250MW installed solar by 2022 (12.5x what Maine has now)
- Expands solar market in Maine to reach to include utility-scale projects, commercial/industrial projects, and large scale community solar
- Completely lifts cap on community solar
- Saves rate payers over $100,000,000 over the program life! All solar projects under the new plan would get a fixed-rate 20-yr contract price for exported solar power
- All solar projects under the new plan would get a fixed-rate 20-yr contract price for exported solar power
- Gathers ‘money left on the table’ by current net metering by allowing small solar producers to aggregate and sell into solar markets (this is essentially how the ‘value of solar’ is recovered and pass on as savings to all ratepayers)
- Grandfathers in existing net metering customers (and new customers until program implementation)
Some answers to questions we’re getting:
Should I go solar now or wait?
People who go solar now can get the best of both worlds – the full benefits of retail net metering now, and the choice of whether to switch over to the new policy or stay with net metering once the new policy is introduced. As we’ve warned, should LD1649 fail, a full attack on net metering may be next, and the best safeguard to this is probably to already be enrolled in the program.
LD1649 specifically does not want to create a gap in the market where homeowners postpone an investment until after the program is in place. Should LD1649 going into effect, any existing net-metered systems can stick with net metering through 2029, or choose to enroll in the new program at the best possible rate.
Does this do away with net metering?
This program seeks to replace net metering with a program that resolves the conflict over net metering in the long-term and will get more solar built in the near-term. If the program fails to get as much solar built as it is intended to do, it has a mechanism by which rates will be re-adjusted, or, barring a fix, will restore net metering completely.
Importantly, anyone who has net metering can stay with it; all parties agree with the need to grandfather in existing solar customers.
Is this policy a subsidy?
No. Numerous studies, most importantly, Maine’s Value of Solar study, suggest that current retail net metering actually UNDER compensates solar generators for their electricity. However, in the spirit of compromise (and current policy reality) we recognize that an evolution to net metering can improve Maine’s solar market in a number of ways.
At least as the bill is written now, this program would replace net metering (and not run both programs in parallel). Again, if the new program fails to perform, net metering exactly as it exists today will return to Maine.
LD1649 makes the solar pricing process more transparent and recovers some market value currently underutilized by net metering, which is how it is modeled to save $55MM+ to Maine ratepayers (based on modeling from Maine’s Public Advocate).
Do you support the bill?
Yes. We particularly appreciate what the bill represents – leadership from a wide coalition of Mainers, from the utilities to labor unions, in solving a challenging policy question. All parties unite around a central concept: “How do we get more solar installed in Maine?” and then worked through different points of view, finding common ground that enabled the group to rough out the terms that ultimately have become the proposal before the legislature today.
We are extremely frustrated that a small group of players, oddly enough, Governor LePage and out of state solar companies, have allied to do everything possible to stop it.
What happens next?
Legislators have yet to vote on the bill, and in the meantime we and all solar advocates are pressing hard to get phone calls and emails into them. Our impression from the legislature is that they see few electoral repercussions if they don’t stand for solar – an impression we need to change. Legislators need to hear from you that you expect them to step away from knee jerk partisanship and to instead work collaboratively to tackle the issues and seize the opportunities in front of them.
Please consider filling out this extremely brief online survey if you haven’t already:
Dear Residents of York,
We are Sydney Fogg and Mary Kocev, eighth grade members of the greenhouse group at York
Middle School. Since fall of 2014, our school has been composting. Grades 5-8 sort their lunch
waste each day. Every Monday, Mr. Fox’s Composting comes and picks up our compost. This
service is not free; we have to pay a fee. With your help, this service could be free.
If we can get 50 households in York to sign-up with Mr. Fox’s, our composting service would be
free! The cost for you to sign up is $16 a month for bi weekly pickup of any food scraps. In
return, you will receive a bag of composted soil. You will also help reduce trash on the planet.
According mrfoxcomposting.com, “Organic materials, including food scraps and paper products,
make up more than two-thirds of the nation’s solid waste stream. Instead of trash, composting
turns all that into rich soil to nourish the Earth.” Since York Middle School started successfully
composting, we have reduced our trash pickup from five to three times a week.
Other York businesses who use Mr. Fox’s Composting include: The York Harbor Inn, Stonewall
Kitchen, Foster’s Clambake, York Hospital, and St. Joe’s. If you are interested, please, take the
survey at the bottom of the page. We urge you to be part of the solution- begin composting at
your home and support York Middle School, too! Thank you for your help.
Compost Interest Survey: http://goo.gl/forms/9KFSDzZTxj
If you have trouble with the survey link, please email Jess Baxter at Jbaxter@yorkschools.org.
Sydney Fogg and Mary Kocev
You can follow the almost real-time electric generation of the solar array on the York Beach Fire Station at http://revisionenergy.solarlog-web.net/york/.
The solar system has been generating electricity for the Fire Department and the Town of York since September of 2015.
Below is an editorial from the Kennebec Journal. It is presented in its entirety because it clearly summarizes a relatively complicated but important piece of legislation.
Lawmakers shouldn’t let politics get in the way of this good bill.
Maine lawmakers have a great opportunity to fairly distribute the costs and benefits of solar power, setting a five-year course that would expand use of renewable energy in a sustainable way.
That is, if they don’t let politics get in the way.
On the table is a compromise bill put together by a stakeholder group, which included power utilities, environmental groups and representatives of a nascent solar energy installation industry.
What they propose is a 12-fold increase in solar power generation over the next five years, with 250 megawatts of new generation roughly split between small rooftop solar installations on homes and small businesses and larger community, industrial and grid-scale projects. Owners of solar installations would sell all the excess power that they produce on sunny days through a long-term contract, which would be credited against the power that they use at night and on cloudy days, lowering their electric bills.
But like most important pieces of legislation passed over the last five years, it will require two-thirds majorities in the House and Senate, which would have to stick together in the face of a likely veto by Gov. Paul LePage. Although his energy office participated in the stakeholder group, he has already signaled his opposition.
But lawmakers should not follow his lead. The compromise plan would put more clean energy on the grid during peak demand months, keeping the power supply reliable. And it would also create jobs and keep money spent on energy in local economies instead of shipping it out of state. This is an opportunity to set Maine on a positive course, and lawmakers should not let it pass them by.
Most opposition to solar power comes from climate-change skeptics, who question the need for any renewable power sources. But the evidence in Maine is mounting that our use of carbon-based energy is shortening our winters, changing the chemical composition of our offshore waters and threatening key industries from forestry to skiing.
There are, however, some legitimate concerns about the way that the cost of operating the electric grid is shared between solar and non-solar electric customers. LePage has rightly pointed out that what has been the high cost of installing solar panels made them unavailable to lower-income utility customers and shifted the responsibility for maintaining the grid onto them from wealthier customers who could afford to make the investment.
That critique, however, does not take into account the rapid decline in the price of solar equipment, which is putting it within reach for a greater number of consumers. And it doesn’t factor in what has been a very small amount of power produced by home-based solar to date – much less than 1 percent of the power on the grid – making the shifted costs more of a theoretical complaint than a real problem.
The proposed plan would fairly share costs even as solar generation grows dramatically, by charging solar customers the full cost of buying electricity before applying credit for excess power sold.
And it would create opportunities for people who can’t currently afford to install solar panels, or live in apartments or developments where that would be impossible, to participate in community solar installations and earn energy credits that lower their bills. Large-scale installations could lower energy costs for manufacturing facilities or shopping malls, and grid-scale projects could put power generation where it’s needed to meet demand at the time of year that it’s needed most. This will benefit all customers who use the grid, whether they choose to invest in solar power or not.
Maine lawmakers should not let politics get in the way of this good idea, and they should seize this opportunity to expand solar power in a sustainable way.
The Energy Steering Committee was highlighted by the York Weekly as one of the town’s “Movers and Shakers” of 2015. From the article by Deborah McDermott:
YORK – During the recent climate talks in Paris, a group of state and provincial government leaders, mayors and municipal officials from throughout the world held a Climate Summit . . . → Read More: York Energy Steering Committee recognized
As reported in the Science section of the Oct. 21, 2015 New York Times, 2015 is likely to be a record-breaker for global warming.
Global temperatures are running far above last year’s record-setting level, all but guaranteeing that 2015 will be the hottest year in the historical record — and undermining political claims that global . . . → Read More: 2015 Likely to Be Hottest Year Ever Recorded
The latest generation of LED (light emitting diode) exterior lighting is significantly more energy efficient than even high pressure sodium fixtures (the orange-tinted street lights that are commonly used). And what’s made the recent use of LED lights take off is the dramatic decline in prices for all types of LED fixtures. However, especially when . . . → Read More: Why is the color of LED lighting so important?
Approved by the Board of Selectmen 5-0, Article 7, a ban on single-use plastic carryout bags, will be on the ballot November 3. Voting is at York High School between 8 AM and 8 PM.
Ways You Can Help Pass the York Bag Ordinance
Canvass for Support. You can help by volunteering . . . → Read More: Vote on Nov. 3 to reduce plastic bag waste
From the 9/30/15 York Weekly story written by Deborah McDermott:
YORK – There was, literally, energy to spare at the York Beach fire station Saturday afternoon, as a crowd of more than 50 residents and well-wishers from throughout the region came there to learn about how the department reduced its energy bill from $325 to . . . → Read More: 98-year-old fire station a ‘high-performing energy system’
An expert from the Rocky Mountain Institute argues that solar energy may be more glamorous, but efficiency, the old workhorse of green buildings, remains a winner, just not in all cases.
“Efficiency first” is the mantra in green and net-zero buildings; you always do energy efficiency first and then cover the remaining balance of energy . . . → Read More: In an Age of Cheap Solar Does Efficiency Still Matter?